Picture of American flag.
   
 PEP

Contact Legislator !
Home
Join PEP
PEP Rules
Cases
Donate To PEP
PEP Shop
PEP in the News
PEP Talk Radio
Political Communication
PEP B.O.D.
FAQ's
Media Contacts
Email PEP
PEP Mailing List

3/22/06 Legislative Testimony – Doug Conley

Chairman Dutton, members of the Committee, my name is Doug Conley.  I am a member of an organization called People for Equal Parenting – which I’ll call “PEP” for the remainder of my testimony.  Thank you for the opportunity to testify.  I also want to specially thank Nicole Bates who worked with PEP’s chairman in order to make it possible for me to testify today under Charge 4.  I understand that in so doing she went beyond the strict requirements of her job and I want her to know how much she’s appreciated.

My former spouse and I divorced in 2005.  During our legal proceedings neither of us ever accused – much less proved – that the other is an unfit parent.  Yet, under the relevant statutes of the State of Texas, each of us has always been treated differently than the other, regarding time with our child.  I’ve always been disturbed about this.  As a result, sometime ago I joined PEP.

PEP is a nonprofit organization that works primarily to educate people about issues connected to family law.  It was set up in 2004.  Since then over 1,000 people have signed up on its website at www.pepintexas.org.

One of the things I’ve learned as a member of PEP is about the evidence that as much as 2/3 of divorce between parents today is done only because the person who files believes he or she will be awarded the lion’s share of post-divorce custody time with the children – along with a significant recurrent forced income transfer between the former spouses.[1]  The written summary of my testimony here today cites to the Brinig and Allen study that supports this common sense observation and I must say that it’s difficult not to conclude that Texas’ child custody system needs an immediate honest evaluation in light of this because if it’s true then what we have is a legal system that incentivizes destroying traditional families.[2]   

Destroying traditional families is bad public policy when we consider that – compared to children from traditional families – children from nontraditional families[3] are:

·       Between 2-1/2 and nearly 6 times as likely to experience child poverty;[4]

·       2-3 times as likely to exhibit a significant emotional or behavioral problem;[5]

·       Have a 77% higher likelihood of being physically abused;[6]

·       Have an 87% higher likelihood of being harmed by physical neglect;[7]

·       Have a 74% higher likelihood of suffering emotional neglect;[8]

·       Have an 80% higher likelihood of suffering serious injury as a result of abuse;[9]

·       Are more than twice as likely to find themselves in state reform institutions.[10]

As an individual, and as – I think – an ordinary member of PEP, I have confidence that the Texas legislature as a whole, and this Committee in particular, will move expeditiously to take the obvious step implicated by available information, which is to install a legal presumption of equal physical child custody when fit parents divorce.  Nothing we can do as a government would do so much, so fast, to slow down our divorce rate and the accompanying damage to the children of Texas as a whole.

Thank you, Chairman Dutton and the members of the Committee for your kind attention.


[1] See, Brinig, Margaret F. and Allen, Douglas W., "'These Boots are Made for Walking': Why Most Divorce Filers are Women" ( 2000). American Law and Economics Review, Vol. 2, pp. 126-169, 2000.

[2] By “traditional” I mean a family consisting of biological mother and father living in the same household with their offspring.

[3] By “nontraditional” I mean a family not consisting of a biological mother and father living in the same household with their offspring.

[4] See, Kids Count Data Book 2000. Baltimore, MD; The Annie E. Casey Foundation, 2000: 12; and Rank, Mark R., and Hirschl, Thomas A., “The Economic Risk of Childhood in America: Estimating the Probability of Poverty Across the Formative Years”.  Journal of Marriage and the Family 61 (November 1999): 1058-1067; and Dalaker, J. and Proctor, B., “Poverty in the United States: 1999”, Current Population Reports, P60-210. Table B-3. Washinton, D.C.: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000.

[5] Zill, N. and Shoenborn, C. “Child Development, Learning and Emotional Problems: Health of Our Nation’s Children”. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Center for Health Statistics, Advance Data 1990.  Washington, D.C.: GPO, November 16, 1990.

[6] Sedlak, A. and Broadhurst, D. “The Third National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect: Final Report”, U.S .Department of Health and Human Services.  National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect.  Washington, D.C., September, 1996.

[7] Ibid.

[8] Ibid.

[9] Ibid.

[10] Beck, Allen, Susan Kline, and Lawrence Greenfield.  “Survey of Youth in Custody, 1987”.  U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics. Washington, D.C.: GPO, September 1988.

 

 

 

Copyright 2005 People for Equal Parenting, Inc. .

This website is hosted by Simply Dialup Internet and maintained by Metrogeek.com